CURRENT STUDY

Title
Subcutaneous and Intravenous Tissue Levels of Cefazolin During Abdominoplasty:        
A Pilot Study

Investigator
Barry N. Silberg, MD, F.A.C.S. Principal Investigator

Purpose
The purpose of this study is collection and analysis of tissue levels of cefazolin in a cohort of patients undergoing an abdominoplasty as a preliminary to a clinical trial.

Project Objectives
The objective of this proposal is to assess tissue levels of cefazolin following traditional intravenous administration with subcutaneous administration using a tissue dispersion technique in a small sample of patients undergoing elective abdominoplasty.

Specific Aims
Using a sample of adults undergoing elective abdominoplasty the study aim is to:

  • Compare the dispersion of cefazolin using two different methods of administration

Hypothesis

  • Tissue cefazolin concentrations are higher when cefazolin is administered subcutaneously using ultrasonic fluid dispersion directly into the surgical site compared to traditional intravenous administration.

Background and Significance
Nearly 30 million patients in the United States undergo surgical procedures annually 1. Site infection following surgery negatively impacts patients, providers, and the health care system. Postoperative infections contribute to increased hospital stays, delay patients’ return to previous level of physical ability, cause increased pain, and increase the risk of death as a result of sepsis and multi-system organ failure 1-3. It is estimated that over 600,000 surgical site infections (SSIs) occur annually 1, with a health care cost of over one billion dollars 4. Open abdominal surgery has one of the highest rates of SSI. Recently, Kabon, et al 5 reported a prevalence of 9% to 27% incidence of SSI in colon surgery, and Sorenson et al 6, reported a rate of 6% to 16% in gastrointestinal surgery. The National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System (NNIS) reported the incidence of infection for certain abdominal surgeries as between 1.7% and 11.6%14.

Subcutaneous delivery of antibiotics followed by external ultrasonic dispersion has been adapted from plastic surgery procedures used during liposuction and body contouring and is proposed as a new approach to an old problem. The antibiotic of interest is cefazolin (Ancef, Kefzol) mixed in a specific volume of saline which is introduced into the surgical area just prior to the incision being made, and after the patient has been anesthetized. The fluid is dispersed deeply into the subcutaneous tissue layer by application of external ultrasound for three minutes. The operation then proceeds in the usual fashion. Theoretical constructs underpinning the intervention are delivery of antibiotics directly to the wound site at the time of greatest need and prevention of tissue dehydration during exposure to air to decrease potential tissue necrosis. Dispersing the antibiotic directly into the tissue just prior to incision ensures high local tissue levels at the time when antibiotic protection is most needed.

Tissue and serum analysis compares the cefazolin levels between intravenous and subcutaneous administration. Prophylactic antibiotics are given ideally within 30 minutes of incision to ensure local tissue penetration and protection against infection from common skin bacteria (Fry, 2006). Assuring adequate tissue levels have been problematic, however, as tissue penetration is dependent upon the patient’s perfusion status, vascular state, timing of administration and appropriate dose.

Simultaneous serum and deep subcutaneous tissue samples collected at the completion of the incision and at one hour will yield levels of Cefazolin to compare between intervention and control groups. In general, plasma is spun off from serum and frozen at -400 C until analyzed. Tissue samples are also frozen until analyzed. A buffer is added to weighed, minced samples, which are then centrifuged and decanted for assay 7.

Methods

A. Design: A cross-sectional descriptive design with repeated measures.
B. Sample
  • Participants will be recruited from adults > 21 years scheduled for elective abdominoplasty procedures at Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital.
C. Instruments
  • The Silberg Tissue Preparation System TM Model ME 800 (9801427) (Mettler Surgical, Anaheim, CA) will be used for subcutaneous saline infusion and application of external ultrasound. The system consists of a 1 Mhz ultrasonic generator device, a 10 cm2 ultrasonic applicator, a peristaltic pump irrigation unit, a foot switch, a size 3 French hollow stainless steel cannula, an IV pole, irrigation tubing and a system cart.
D. Procedure

After approval by the Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital Institutional Review Board a convenience sample of patients scheduled for elective abdominoplasty will be screened in the usual manner to determine eligibility for the procedure. The investigator, at the initial consultation, will approach potential subjects preoperatively. Informed written consent will be obtained.

Subjects in group A  will receive the following intervention:

Participants will receive intravenous antibiotic (cefazolin) prophylaxis as ordered by the surgeon in accordance with hospital protocol. Fatty tissue samples will be obtained from fascial level of the wound at the time of incision and at 1 hour or prior to closing, whichever comes first. Simultaneous serum samples will be collected.

Subjects in group B will receive the following intervention:

Once in the operating suite, and under general anesthesia and sterile conditions, the operative area will be prepped in accordance with standard procedure. A small stab wound will be made with #15 scalpel blade at the end point of the intended incision. The irrigating cannula, previously connected to the peristaltic pump, will be introduced into the subcutaneous tissue through the stab wound. 250 mls of pre-warmed saline containing 1 gram of Cefazolin will be infused approximately 1 cm under the skin as the cannula is advanced along the intended path of the incision. Following infusion, ultrasound energy at 3 watts/cm2 will be continuously applied with the ultrasonic applicator for 3 minutes externally to disperse the saline into the surrounding tissue. Fatty tissue samples will be obtained from the level adjacent to deep fascia at the time of incision and at 1 hour or prior to closing, whichever comes first. Simultaneous serum samples will be collected.

E. Protocols
  • Tissue samples weighing approximately 15 grams each from all subjects will be obtained at the fascial level of the incision immediately after the incision is made and 1 hour later, or at closing, whichever occurs first. Blood samples of 10 mls each will be collected simultaneously. Samples will be frozen at -40o C and sent to David P. Nicolau, PharmD, FCCP, Center for Anti-Infective Research & Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT for analysis of antiobiotic levels.
  • All data will be recorded on data specific collection sheets, filed in a locked cabinet kept in a locked room. 
  • Data for all participants will be collected on gender, age, admission date, surgery date, discharge date, and readmission within 30 days. Data will include type and length of surgery, length, depth and placement of the incision, anesthetic class, hemoglobin, hematocrit, and antibiotic use beyond the expected prophylaxis.

Statistical Analysis

Frequency distributions and histograms will be used to screen all data for missing values and accuracy of data entry. Data will be analyzed for normality of distribution. Measures of central tendency will be used to characterize the data. Differences in antibiotic tissue and serum levels will be compared through cross tabulation tables, the χ2 Test of Independence, and standardized residuals. Within subject means will be compared using t-tests for normally distributed data. Between group means will be compared using analysis of variance and correlation techniques.

Reference List

1. Bratzler DW, Houck PM, Richards C, et al. Use of antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery: baseline results from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Archives of Surgery. Feb 2005;140(2):174-182.
2. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology. 1999;20:247-280.
3. Nichols RL. Preventing Surgical Site Infections: A Surgeon's Perspective. Centers for Disease Control: Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2001;7(2).
4. Kaye KS, Schmit K, Pieper C, et al. The effect of increasing age on the risk of surgical site infection. J Infect Dis. Apr 1 2005;191(7):1056-1062.
5. Kabon B, Akca O, Taguchi A, et al. Supplemental intravenous crystalloid administration does not reduce the risk of surgical wound infection. Anesth Analg. Nov 2005;101(5):1546-1553.
6. Sorensen LT, Hemmingsen U, Kallehave F, et al. Risk factors for tissue and wound complications in gastrointestinal surgery. Ann Surg. Apr 2005;241(4):654-658.
7. Dudley MN, Nightingale CH, Drezner AD, Low HB, Quintiliani R. Comparative penetration of cefonicid and cefazolin into the atrial appendage and pericardial fluid of patients undergoing open-heart surgery. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Sep 1984;26(3):347-350.

Effects on MSRA

Cefazolin administered intravenously generates adipose tissue levels between 3-5 micrograms/ml after injection. This is far below therapeutic tissue levels.  Using the Silberg Tissue Preparation System in our IRB study, tissue levels at the time of surgery average 1200 micrograms/ml in the target area.

Clinical testing for the effectiveness of Cefazolin when used against MRSA utilizes concentrations no greater than 250 micrograms/ml. At this dose Cefazolin is ineffective against MRSA. 

The two slides demonstrate the effectiveness of Cefazolin at a concentration of 1000 micrograms/ml when used against MRSA. The first slide is at 20 hours and the second is at 40 hours.
 

At 20 Hours

At 40 Hours









©2008 Santa Rosa Antibiotic Effectiveness Research Project, Inc.
P. O. Box 1244 | Santa Rosa, CA 95402 | (707) 282-5591 - Tel | (707) 568-3005 - Fax